nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Detect how WFT is started?

RonaldV

Hi,

how can you detect in a wft how the job is started (on submit/assign/new-job/...)?

Thanks, Ronald
TS65 on Win2k

TS552/TS65, Win2k
OD560/OD601

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

saumil

Hi,
I am not sure about direct way.

But tricky solution can be use _TAG_(iw_workarea) in wft.
For submit it will give you valid WORKAREA and for new job it will give you null.
Not tried yet but may be use full for you.

Saumil
BTWholesale | CMS
TS 5.5.2 - Solaris 8.0

RonaldV

Be warned!

I checked all params that Teamsite passed to the wft for both 'new job' & 'submit' and both contain the iw_workarea element on TS65. I think this is going to break many wft's that when the teamsite-server they run on is being upgraded. :-)

Still thanks for your reply.

Ronald

TS552/TS65, Win2k
OD560/OD601

Migrateduser

I don't believe there is any supported way of accomplishing this today, but I suppose you could edit available_templates.ipl such that it sets some value somewhere. In this file, the variable you're interested in is $COMMAND. Do this at your own risk, but hey, if it works, post back and let us know what ya did!

Dave

Current Environment(s):
(1) TS 6.1 SP2 on W2K3
(2) TS 6.1 SP2 on W2K
(3) TS 6.1 on W2K

RonaldV

Thanks dave,

I was hoping for a supported solution. :-)

Ronald

TS552/TS65, Win2k
OD560/OD601

Johnny

Nothing will break.

If you are inside a workarea when invoking a "new job" iw_workarea will always be passed.

What is it that you would actually like to achieve?..
There might be another way if you describe your goal.

John Cuiuli

RonaldV

Hi,

I need to create some wfts that have lot's in common but that have some differences. Something along this way:

- submit-wft: review1, review2, submit
- assign or new-job-wft: do-work, review1, etc.

So if I would know how the wft would have been called I would be done.

Ronald

TS552/TS65, Win2k
OD560/OD601

Adam Stoller

I think you need to contact Support - see if they can find out if there is some as-yet-unknown way for you to do this, and if not, have them open up a feature request for you.

The only way I can think of to do this would be to have essentially empty wrapper-wfts that would act as "parent" workflows and have them pass along all their information *and* set a job variable in the [common] "child" workflow to indicate how they were initiated. E.g.:

mySubmitWFT: Instantiation Form -> externaltask -> CommonWFT (wftType = "submit")
myAssignWFT: Instantiation Form -> externaltask -> CommonWFT (wftType = "assign")
myNewJobWFT: InstantiationForm -> externaltask -> CommonWFT (wftType = "new_job")
...

The externaltask would use either iwjobc or iwwft_compile.ipl to call the CommonWFT - alternatively you could use an externaltask to set the wftType in the "parent" workflow and use a wftask to initiate the new job (I believe in 6.x there's background="t" attribute for wftfile-style wftasks - the CommonWFT would then be responsible for determining the parent workflow and extracting information like wftType from it.

--fish
Senior Consultant, Quotient Inc.
http://www.quotient-inc.com

RonaldV

Thanks all , for your input.

TS552/TS65, Win2k
OD560/OD601