Hello Experts,
Does xCP 2.0 have support for automated tests similar JUnit testing etc. or do we have to test everything manually by hand?
Thanks in advance
As long as I know is not possible execute automated tests in xCP 2.0
Everything is web service calls - so for the most part, you can load test using a variety of tools.
If you enable fiddler or web tracing, you can see the calls that are generated for different actions, such as authentication, form submission, ...
Hello, Imran!What exactly do you want to test ( bpm , service , custom bof , web ) ?
Thanks
Hello,
I don't want to test everything manually when I modify a process or a form. Instead, I want to use automated tests to make sure that the system is still working properly. So, that will include almost all of the above. Forms are reliant on processes and they are reliant on BOF. Is there a way to do it automatically? or xCP suggests to test everything by hand?
Imran Yusubov wrote:or xCP suggests to test everything by hand?
Yes
Is there a way to do it automatically?
No ((. I develop framework for testing, but i can hardly support of forms ((. Now you can testing BOF and lifecycle for 7.1 Version of framework for support bpm 6.7 exists , but it is not tested extensively
That is a huge drawback. I know how much time we waste on manual testing. No documentation has even a single line for automated tests; hence, I decided to open a thread and see maybe someone has a workaround.
Imran Yusubov wrote:That is a huge drawback. I know how much time we waste on manual testing. No documentation has even a single line for automated tests; hence, I decided to open a thread and see maybe someone has a workaround.
therefore I develop my own projecthttps://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-34593
Seems great.
We use Fitnesse for Process Testing.
We cannot test the forms part, but at least you know the process and its flows are correct.
Fitnesse
If you create some Slim Fixtures to start a workflow, and some to modify attributes, you can go a long way already.
even though old thread, just updating the link for reference
