nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

install_webapps.ipl vs make_toolkit.ipl

ccprofessional

Hi,

What's the difference between these CLTs - install_webapps.ipl and make_toolkit.ipl?

I usually use install_webapps.ipl after any UI changes. When is each recommended?

Thanks!
cc

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

ccprofessional

I just saw this thread which talks about the difference:

http://devnet.interwoven.com/forums/cgi-bin/showthreaded.pl?Cat=&Board=PRODUCTS_TEAMSITE&Number=54192&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1#Post54192

When I look at the code for make_toolkit.ipl I do not see any reference to install_webapps.ipl (So, I can't believe that make_toolkit does everything that install_webapps.ipl does - as suggested in the above thread)
What is the best practise - which tool should I use under what circumstances? If I run install_webapps.ipl, does it not merge the xmls but just recompiles webapp?

Thanks

Bill Klish

I rarely use install_webapps.ipl unless I have done something to the content center web app through some custom java code that makes things not function correctly anymore. For the most part, as we make customizations to the user interface we always use make_toolkit.ipl.

See the Building the Web Application chapter of the User Interface Customization Guide for more information.