nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Referring the current replicant index

sswamina2002

Hi,
I am working in a TS6.5 SP2 environment. I need solution for the following scenario.

I have a (non-replicant) container named "table". I have a replicant container named "row" which can allows max of 50 replicants, nested inside the "table" container. I have another replicant container named "columns" nested inside the "row" replicant container.

"Columns" replicant container has another two (non-replicant) containers named "a" and "b". For each columns replicant, I have to make either "a" or "b" visible based on some criteria.

How do I do it. I can loop thru all the columns replicants and make either "a" or "b" visible but I dont want to do that. I want to make it work for the current instance of the columns replicant.

Thank you,
Sri

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

jbonifaci

When do you want this to happen? If you want it to happen onFormInit, you're going to have to look through everything. If you want it to happen onReplicantAdded, you get the instance passed in to your event handler, so process it accordingly.

~Jeff

kaalraa

Anything to be done within the form needs an event to update. For example if you extract your condition at the time of form initialization then put the setVisible at the time Forminit.

If it is at the time of adding the replicant in either row or column then you get the current instance of the replicant as the item with in the handler function.

So... please be more precise as when you want the fields to get visible?

Hi,
I am working in a TS6.5 SP2 environment. I need solution for the following scenario.

I have a (non-replicant) container named "table". I have a replicant container named "row" which can allows max of 50 replicants, nested inside the "table" container. I have another replicant container named "columns" nested inside the "row" replicant container.

"Columns" replicant container has another two (non-replicant) containers named "a" and "b". For each columns replicant, I have to make either "a" or "b" visible based on some criteria.

How do I do it. I can loop thru all the columns replicants and make either "a" or "b" visible but I dont want to do that. I want to make it work for the current instance of the columns replicant.

Thank you,
Sri

sswamina2002

When do you want this to happen? If you want it to happen onFormInit, you're going to have to look through everything. If you want it to happen onReplicantAdded, you get the instance passed in to your event handler, so process it accordingly.

~Jeff

Thanks for the suggestions. I am doing it in the onReplicantAdded Event. How do I refer to the current instance. I am not able to refer to it in the code.
In the following I want to know the value of x and y to refer to the current instance.
IWDatacapture.getItem("/root/table/row/columns/").getChildren()/a;

How do I do this. All I have to do is
IWDatacapture.getItem("/root/table/row/columns/").getChildren()/a.setVisible

jbonifaci

Thanks for the suggestions. I am doing it in the onReplicantAdded Event. How do I refer to the current instance. I am not able to refer to it in the code.
In the following I want to know the value of x and y to refer to the current instance.
IWDatacapture.getItem("/root/table/row/columns/").getChildren()/a;

How do I do this. All I have to do is
IWDatacapture.getItem("/root/table/row/columns/").getChildren()/a.setVisible

The instance is passed to the event handler:

 function onReplicantAddedEventHandler(replicantInstance) {}

~Jeff

AjaySant

I guess u dont have to give values of x and y. Just add an event //IWEventRegistry.addItemHandler("/root/table/row/columns","onReplicantAdded",onReplicantAddedEventHandler);

function onReplicantAddedEventHandler(replicantInstance)
{
// replicantInstance is the instance of current replicant.. that is the one add.
}

I guess this should work for you.