I did experience the same thing.Before installing you need to make sure all services of Symantec are disabled and stop.Aslo the Norton email module cause problem so we no longer install it on our server.Another issue was IIS 6.0, if the default web is rename or path modified, Teamsite does not get configure properly because it is hardcooded in the TSpostreboot.ipl
Hi,As I said in my posting, we did not even install the Symantec products until after the TS install. We also made sure that when we did install it, it was without the email services. The IIS got configured like it should, and TeamSite was working perfectly before we did the iw-migrate with the old backing store. I have now re-instated the empty backing store TS created during the install, and everything is working fine again. I've got a top-tuned server performing perfectly, just without any data!I'm leaning towards the iwmigrate command having messed things up:We renamed our built-in administrator account before installing TS (company naming conventions), and installed everything using this account, which seems to work fine. However, IW informed us that iwmigrate wont work unless there is a user named Administrator, with administrative rights on the server, so we created such a user and ran iw-migrate with it.That’s when the blue screens started. Microsoft identified \FileSystem\iwfsd as the culprit, and we currently have a support case open with IW. The funny thing is that in the debug-logs from MS, there is a mention of the path of the very branch we tested the iwmigrate on:Object: 887f41c8 Type: (8d57e900) File ObjectHeader: 887f41b0 HandleCount: 0 PointerCount: 1 Directory Object: 00000000 Name: \default\main\boc\global\external\bocdotcom\EDITION {InterwovenPseudoVCB}Coincidence? I THINK NOT!Could it be that because we ran iw-migrate with a user that was only a member of the Administrators group, and not the actual local Administrator, iwmigrate corrupted the backingstore we tried to migrate? I’m clutching at straws, I know….
Another thing that just struck me: iwmigrate shouldnt be changing anything on the backing store it's migrating FROM, should it?The "old" (5.5) backing store was working fine on the TS 6.5 box until we iwmigrated and created a new bs with a branch from the old one. After that, both of those two backing stores caused errors.It was only when reverting back to the default store created on install that the server started behaving again.
However, what they sent us was a knowledge article (55358) describing the scenario we are in, and it says:"take a copy of the backingstore from 5.5 [..} configure TeamSite to use it by placing it in the path of the default iw-store location on the TeamSite 6.5 system"Then it says to run iwmigrate to create a new store:
if we were to run iwmigrate from our old Production server to the new one, we'd be looking at one weeks down-time again, arent we?
This is basically the heart of my problems, because I'd happily let TS deal with it and not do the pesky iwconvert, but as you said: the message we got from IW was that we should do it, and that in future, it's likely to show up on recommendations from IW support anyway, and so we'd rather do it now before we go live with this new server since they told us the command could take over a week to run(!) and we dont want that kind of down-time for our users.However, what they sent us was a knowledge article (55358) describing the scenario we are in, and it says:"take a copy of the backingstore from 5.5 [..} configure TeamSite to use it by placing it in the path of the default iw-store location on the TeamSite 6.5 system"Then it says to run iwmigrate to create a new store:iwmigrate -m Y:/default -o P:\iw-store\new -b \default\main -g > migration_log.txt 2>&1And then configure TS 6.5 to use this new store. So everything is happening on the new TS 6.5 server. The article is dated 25 Apr 06, so it's fairly new.I know iwmigrate is also used to move stores between servers, but we are basically just following the IW instructions, besides, if we were to run iwmigrate from our old Production server to the new one, we'd be looking at one weeks down-time again, arent we?