nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

RegEx in available_templates.cfg

Icebreaker

Hi There,

We were using RegEx in available_templates.cfg in TeamSite 6.5 SP3. Now we have moved to TeamSite 6.7.2. I know its all now 'and', 'or', 'not', I wonder if RegEx can be used along with the said keywords.

I have branching structure like /default/main/top_branch/

under this top_branch I have multple sub branches example a,B,c,d,E,f...z

In my available templates, I want to enable a WF only for branch G and not for others, this what I have, can someone validate?

[html]

[/html]

Regards,

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Adam Stoller

Hi There,

We were using RegEx in available_templates.cfg in TeamSite 6.5 SP3. Now we have moved to TeamSite 6.7.2. I know its all now 'and', 'or', 'not', I wonder if RegEx can be used along with the said keywords.

I have branching structure like /default/main/top_branch/

under this top_branch I have multple sub branches example a,B,c,d,E,f...z

In my available templates, I want to enable a WF only for branch G and not for others, this what I have, can someone validate?

[html]

[/html]

Regards,

Take a look at the available_templates.dtd in the same directory as the available_templates.cfg file - in there you should be able to find the answer to your question (yes, it would be nice if this were documented better in the manuals, perhaps it even is - I've just gotten used to looking at the DTD for the reference information I need)

Migrateduser

Wrapping an OR around a single element means nothing. I would think you'd want to use an AND:

[HTML]

[/HTML]

Something like that...meaning you want the G directory and no others.

Adam Stoller

Wrapping an OR around a single element means nothing. I would think you'd want to use an AND:

[HTML]

[/HTML]

Something like that...meaning you want the G directory and no others.

Actually - in the above case - the 'not' would be assumed and all you should need is:[html]

[/html]However I still recommend reading the DTD and/or the workflow developer's guide (not the section in the TS Admin guide which still references the old DTD - sigh)

Migrateduser

Right - that makes sense. Do you really need to wrap the AND around the single branch, though?

Adam Stoller

Right - that makes sense. Do you really need to wrap the AND around the single branch, though?

Well - if that were the sole condition for the workflow, no - there was an implicit assumption that there would be something else above or below the 'branch' specification within the 'and' clause.

FYI - the signature change you made is retroactive - and based on your number of posts @ $0.001 per usage - you now owe me $2.456 :-)

Migrateduser

Well - if that were the sole condition for the workflow, no - there was an implicit assumption that there would be something else above or below the 'branch' specification within the 'and' clause.

FYI - the signature change you made is retroactive - and based on your number of posts @ $0.001 per usage - you now owe me $2.456 :-)

When you get down here for Sushi I will hand over your royalty check. Smiley Surprised

)

I checked the docs and every example (and all our entries in available_models.xml) use the AND wrapped around single vpath-regex entries (with no other restrictions in the <allowed> section. Maybe because it's a regex that can resolve to multiple vpaths? It's not documented well - shocker! But as long as it works, I'm not gonna worry about it too much.

Adam Stoller

When you get down here for Sushi I will hand over your royalty check. )

I checked the docs and every example (and all our entries in available_models.xml) use the AND wrapped around single vpath-regex entries (with no other restrictions in the <allowed> section. Maybe because it's a regex that can resolve to multiple vpaths? It's not documented well - shocker! But as long as it works, I'm not gonna worry about it too much.

I don't have my virtual machine running right now (and don't feel like starting it) - but in thinking about this - it may be that the DTD only provides for 'and', 'or', and 'not' directly within the 'allowed' element - and thus you would need to have the 'and' clause there for a single restriction. (You can probably verify that easily enough)

mdang

No. The and, or, not tag is not strictly required. Meaning that:

[html]

[/html]

is absolutely fine.

--Michael

Adam Stoller

No. The and, or, not tag is not strictly required. Meaning that:

[html]

[/html]

is absolutely fine.

--Michael

Ah yes - I just had a chance to look at the DTD:[html]...

...[/html]and thus the above is, as you say, perfectly legal.

Thanks mdang for following up on this thread.