nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Issue with XML Parsing and Characters

vinitsmore

Hi

I am trying to replace existing XML node with new value.

I am attaching
1) Perl Program
2) Actual file
3) Log file with this forum.

In the Program, I am trying to delete all values from object_details node. That is working fine.

But if I try to access XML after that, /</;//p/>/; is getting converted into /</;p/>

and many more.. Please refer to the log file..

Can please someone look into it.

Thanks
Vinit

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Adam Stoller

...

But if I try to access XML after that, /</;//p/>/; is getting converted into /</;p/>
...

From some of my past experiences, I've found that the '>' symbol is not as problematic for XML parsing as the '<' symbol, so the entitizing of only the open-element in the output is probably sufficient.

Where, if anywhere, is this causing you problems?

vinitsmore

From some of my past experiences, I've found that the '>' symbol is not as problematic for XML parsing as the '<' symbol, so the entitizing of only the open-element in the output is probably sufficient.

Where, if anywhere, is this causing you problems?

I have some tags and some data in following format
and I have some characters here and some tags.. which I want to delete..

But its not working properly..

Adam Stoller

I have some tags and some data in following format
<object_details>and I have some characters here and some tags.. which I want to delete.. </object_details>

But its not working properly..

Please learn to format and preview your posts correctly.

I'm still not understanding the problem you are having, because I do not know the code you are writing nor the process in which the code is being used.

As long as you know that the '<' is being entitized and the '>' is (or may) not - you should be able to adjust your code accordingly.

vinitsmore

Hi..

I am trying to replace existing DCR XML with new one.. I have built new XML..
I want to replace it with the existing one..

In existing XML.. there is one Node called as -- Object_Details node..I am trying to replace this node.

While doing to .
1) I am clearing existing object_details node using set_inner_xml as blank.
2) I am replacing object_details string with new values.

Second step is working fine..

But when I use, get_xml function, its not showing enclosing tags.. So when I construct a new DCR and opens up, I get DCR parsing error. because, of mismatching tags.

Please help me

Adam Stoller

...
Please help me

Your choices here are:

vinitsmore

[QUOTE=ghoti]Your choices here are:

I would not have posted this on forum.. if all these were possible..

vpatel

I would not have posted this on forum.. if all these were possible..

Not even this one???

Do more reading and experimentation with your code yourself - learn by doing

test.rptdesign

vinitsmore

I am looking into this.. I am not here to argue with you guys..!! I am looking for some help here..

Vpatel..If you cant suggest anything.. please dont reply..

XLS_Emitter Problem.bmp

Adam Stoller

I am looking into this.. I am not here to argue with you guys..!! I am looking for some help here..

Vpatel..If you cant suggest anything.. please dont reply..

If you cannot take constructive criticisms, perhaps you shouldn't post in a public forum...

You've been given a number of suggestions, and even (if I recall correctly) bits and pieces of code in several different threads on this same topic. If you cannot figure it out from that, and you are unable or unwilling to provide a complete copy of the code you are trying to write and manipulate, and can't find it yourself by reading, and can't hire someone to come in and do it for you - don't blame us for not wanting to write the code for you for free.

If you find this response objectionable - sorry - but don't blame me, or vpatel, or nipper, or ISCBorisB for not being able to make you better at your job.

thatfish

Could try an alternative approach:-

Quick and dirty approach but can have it's advantages given the right circumstances.please note - I am not recommending this approach - badly coded you can do more harm than good