nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Java API "pretty displays"

System

We are on TS 6.7.2. I'm working on portlets (servlet plus .jsp). The portlets are to display files similar to how other portlets do (like work in progress)

I've been searching, but cannot seem to find anything in the API to help display these files with all the features (blue when hover, edit link, Actions menu, etc.)

I was hoping that something would make this "easy", but it appears I need to spend a lot more time looking at the page source that TS produces in ccStd and fiddle with the HTML/Javascript. It's just a lot more complicated than I was hoping.

Has this been the experience of others who have tried this?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Bjorn

Has this been the experience of others who have tried this?

Yes. That has been my experience. In my humble, but still cranky opinion, it's not the best design either, so it's not like looking in one place is going to get you all the info you need. We ended up implemented a separate style for customizations. It's not seamless, but the users don't mind because it works. I can see how not every user base would think that way though.

Migrateduser

Yes. That has been my experience. In my humble, but still cranky opinion, it's not the best design either,

I'm open to suggestions...

Bjorn

I'm open to suggestions...

I was referring to Interwoven's...errr...Autonomy's design, not yours. Smiley Happy

I said that to indicate that what I consider to be a poor design on their part makes it difficult to replicate if you're trying to match look-and-feel.

Migrateduser

I was referring to Interwoven's...errr...Autonomy's design, not yours.

I said that to indicate that what I consider to be a poor design on their part makes it difficult to replicate if you're trying to match look-and-feel.

Sorry.

At this point, I agree wholeheartedly. I want access to the API that Autonomy must be using inside ccStd to produce the code for the browser...