nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Massive deployment speed difference OD 5.5.2

nipper

This is strange. I have a WF that I run an iwodstart, it takes 4 seconds to run. My customer wants a custom menu item to deploy. Fine. Using the same deployment, OD takes 1 minute 41 seconds. This is on the same machine, just copying to /tmp. I have included the logfiles. OD runs for almost 2 minutes, just very slowly from the custom menu item.

Name (ID) Start Target Status Elapsed Owner Actions
configfilesinstance (m177) 4/18/03 3:19 PM e02k34(mylocalhost.move config) completed 0:00:04 rc572c

configfilesinstance (m179) 4/18/03 3:43 PM e02k34(mylocalhost.move config) completed 0:01:41 rc572c

I have included the logs. Any clue ? I need a drink.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Adam Stoller

FWIW - your slow deployment is deploying from /.iwmnt/default/... (the non-caching mount-point), while your fast deployment is deploying from /default which is, I believe, essentially deploying from the caching (/iwmnt no '.') mount point.

My guess is you are supplying the path for the source of the deployment as part of the custom script, before doing so - just use a little regex: $path =~ s|^/\.?iwmnt||; and see if that fixes the problem.

--fish
(Interwoven Senior Technical Consultant)

12386.pdf

nipper

huge freaking difference. I was being lazy (OK so that is a big surprise) and just grabbing $area_path from the environment variable. That did include /.iwmnt

Thanks a bunch Fish

Andy

Migrateduser

just want to point out KB 49776 .
for dirdiff and filelist deployments, there is some exposure, so
it might be better to use /.iwmnt (the non-cached mount).
for tsbased deployments, use /default.
the drawback of /.iwmnt is the perf slow-down.
there is known enhancement that is planned for OD5.6 SP2 (?)