nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

is there a known Bug in the WFExpressionBuilder ?

Wolfgang_Binder_(sglcadmin2_-_(deleted))

Hello !i programed a WFDataType. its like the Attributes,with spetial features. the attribute I use isa data type identical to Text List from the Attributes.I debugged the knowledge from the WFAtributes.and ma programed it in the same way. I wrote also in the Scripts (GetConditionalInfo,GetEvaluateConditionInfo)and the retVals are similar/identical to the WFAttr !now if i'm setting up the EvalStep with simperl boolean expressions its working good !if the boolean expression is a litle sophisticatedits not working !please give me a hint on this, if its not a bug !which are the things I have to take care if i want to implement evalstep with my WFDataType ? are there morescripts which are passed ?I implementeg the ProcessStep (can set my special attributes now) it workin perfectly ! but the evalStep not :-((( byeWolfgang.Binder@siemens.com

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Jeff_Lang_(lang_(Delete)_2245920)

There is no known bug and you seem to be doing things correctly. You can debug the problem more if you put a breakpoint in the script WFMAIN:WAPIPkg.TestCondValuesThis is where the values are tested to determine the true or false criteria.

Wolfgang_Binder_(sglcadmin2_-_(deleted))

... hard work to gain the knoledge for ll-Customization !but, big kompliment to the LL-Developers !LL Modular Softwarearchitecture is realy sexy !will debug also WFMAIN:WAPIPkg.TestCondValues ...nice weekendWolfgang.Binder@siemens.com

Wolfgang_Binder_(sglcadmin2_-_(deleted))

hi Jef !so, i reproduced the WF with the Attribute Package.( i mentioned that I programed a spetial attributepackage using attributs similar to Text-List in the attributes package ... and I realized that the eval-Stepis producing strange decisions .)i reproduced and debugged the behavior with the attributes and it warks the same. Seems that its not a failure in my programming.Maby a failure in my understanding of evaluate-Expressions.please help me on these :make an import of my attached map,and edit the evaluate step.there you see the Expressions...the last expr is

"TWO=2" AND "THREE=3" AND "FOUR = 4") OR ("MAIN=1")so, i initiate the wfopen the assigmentand set the attributesONE=1,TWO=2,THREE=3,FOURE=4,MAIN=2send onand then in the assignments i'm findingUser2as I understand the boolean logic of the exxpresion,there should appeare also User1 !?because (TWO=2 AND THREE=3 AND FOUR=4) OR (MAIN=2)is TRUE !!what is wrong in my understanding ?is there a spetial syntax needed ?is the syntax wrong at all ?do you find something ?byeWolfgang.Binder@siemens.com

Jeff_Lang_(lang_(Delete)_2245920)

It looks like there might be a problem with the code that does the precedence evaluations. You should report this as a bug to support so it can get scheduled to be fixed.