From: eLink Discussion: Livelink Builder Discussion [mailto:componentbuilder@elinkkc.opentext.com] Sent: woensdag 2 februari 2005 23:29To: eLink RecipientSubject: Removal of $LLIAPI.UsersPkg.GetAdminCookie() in 9.5 Removal of $LLIAPI.UsersPkg.GetAdminCookie() in 9.5 Posted by VIZDOMAdmin on 02/02/2005 05:26 PM Hi, We have a custom module that used the method above, however, that method seems to have been removed for 9.5. If a module needs to perform an action as Admin under the covers (i.e. the user isn't logged in as Admin) what's the recommended way to handle that now?ThanksDawn
From: eLink Discussion: Livelink Builder Discussion [mailto:componentbuilder@elinkkc.opentext.com] Sent: vrijdag 4 februari 2005 0:37To: eLink RecipientSubject: Hi Hans, Hi Hans, Posted by VIZDOMAdmin on 02/03/2005 06:36 PM In reply to: RE Removal of $LLIAPI.UsersPkg.GetAdminCookie() in 9.5 Posted by hstoop (Stoop, Hans) on 02/03/2005 04:15 PM Hi Hans, Thanks for the tip, however I'm not sure it'll work for us - in our case we were calling the $LLIAPI.UsersPkg.GetAdminCookie() method and then grabbing the Admin user name and password out of the cookie. I'm unclear how I can get the same information via the Prgctx
From: eLink Discussion: Livelink Builder Discussion [mailto:componentbuilder@elinkkc.opentext.com] Sent: zaterdag 12 februari 2005 0:30To: eLink RecipientSubject: Actually, what we need is the Admin user, as we have an object we've changed... Actually, what we need is the Admin user, as we have an object we've changed... Posted by VIZDOMAdmin on 02/11/2005 06:27 PM In reply to: RE Hi Hans, Posted by hstoop (Stoop, Hans) on 02/04/2005 05:36 AM Actually, what we need is the Admin user, as we have an object we've changed between versions of our module and we need to access the database, look for any old versions of this object, and upgrade them if we find any. ThanksDawn