custom worflow module fails to load after upgrade to 9.5

I have a custom module (created by a previous admin) which basically is the Process step reworked to send attachments in the email in a workflow.once we upgraded to 9.5 it no longer works.attached is the trace file.in the trace it appears to choke on this line in the SendingEmail functionconfig = .LoadAgentConfiguration( prgCtx )however in the debugger, it chokes on the kernel LockUnlockOspace function (when a breakpoint is set on SendingEmail) if OS.IsFeature( OS.Root( spec ), "Startup" ) && \ // XDBs have no startup feature( Type( OS.Root( spec ).Startup ) == ScriptType )I don't know how the program context (prgCtx) is generated in 9.5Any help would be greatly appreciatedThanks,

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Greg_Griffiths_(ggriffiths_-_(deleted))

Toby, Without looking in detail at the module or its usage it looks like the error is on line 9 of the method LoadAgentConfiguration and is due to an incorrect number of parameters being provided to that function drawing on the info. Any fixes to this will require a little development, let me know if u want me to have a look at it for you.

Toby_Bartlett_(hanafb04_-_(deleted))

Hi Gregg,Thanks for the reply! I've perused your website many times and I would greatly appreciate any help on this. (As this module is crucial to many of our workflows)I agree with your assessment and last week I changed the LoadAgentConfig to this but it still doesn't work. I went from 3 params to 2.function Dynamic LoadAgentconfiguration( \ Object prgCtx ) Dynamic agentConfig Object utils = $LLAgent.Utils // v9.2 // agentConfig = utils.ConfigLoad( \// prgCtx.fDBConnect.fConnection, \// prgCtx.fDBConnect.fLogin, \// 100 ) // 100 is the system agent configID // 9.5 + style agentConfig = utils.ConfigLoad( \ prgCtx.fDBConnect.fConnection, \ 100 ) // 100 is the system agent configID return( agentConfig ) endBy the way, this is actually David. Toby and I share this account. I can make my own, but I never bothered for some reason.Thanks,

eLink User

Message from Nair, Krishnankutty via eLink<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">RE: I changed the LoadAgentConfig to this

If you can do a simple check
select * from agentconfig //I see only one row for this
The configID field should return 100 that is what that call is doing

In my 9.5 Sp1 all this script is doing is this
function Dynamic LoadAgentconfiguration( \
Object prgCtx )

return( $LLAgent.Utils.ConfigLoad( prgCtx.fDBConnect.fConnection, 100 ) ) // 100 is the system agent configID

End

You pass a prgCtx and it is pulling that info and I think that is what you do
In your call also,you have introduced a new dynamic variable to return it so that should not matter.what you want to know is if the prgctx is filled in or not hwne the call is hit.Can you put a break in that and see if you rae getting an error or not?

If you can see the screenshot I would expect a defined value at my config object.
All the other echo's are stuff that I wrote and are irrelevant to the general scheme of things

Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)

-----Original Message-----
From: eLink Discussion: Development Discussion [mailto:development@elinkkc.opentext.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:31 AM
To: eLink Recipient
Subject: I changed the LoadAgentConfig to this

I changed the LoadAgentConfig to this
Posted by Bartlett, Toby on 07/23/2007 10:19 AM

Hi Gregg,
Thanks for the reply! I've perused your website many times and I would greatly appreciate any help on this. (As this module is crucial to many of our workflows)

I agree with your assessment and last week I changed the LoadAgentConfig to this but it still doesn't work. I went from 3 params to 2.

function Dynamic LoadAgentconfiguration( \
Object prgCtx )

        Dynamic         agentConfig

        Object         utils = $LLAgent.Utils

// v9.2
//      agentConfig = utils.ConfigLoad( \
//              prgCtx.fDBConnect.fConnection, \
//              prgCtx.fDBConnect.fLogin, \
//              100 ) // 100 is the system agent configID

                // 9.5 + style
                agentConfig = utils.ConfigLoad( \
                                prgCtx.fDBConnect.fConnection, \
                                100 ) // 100 is the system agent configID


        return( agentConfig )
end

By the way, this is actually David. Toby and I share this account. I can make my own, but I never bothered for some reason.

Thanks,

[To reply to this thread, use your normal E-mail reply function.]

============================================================

Topic: custom worflow module fails to load after upgrade to 9.5
https://knowledge.opentext.com/knowledge/llisapi.dll/open/12645669

Discussion: Development Discussion
https://knowledge.opentext.com/knowledge/llisapi.dll/open/786303

Livelink Server:
https://knowledge.opentext.com/knowledge/llisapi.dll

To Unsubscribe from this Discussion, send an e-mail to unsubscribe.development@elinkkc.opentext.com.

Anadarko Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited.

Nair_Krishnankutty_(nairkrishnankutty_-_(deleted))

And looking at your trace file I thing you should be doing a call for 501,instead of 100 because I think that is what the code is expecting.I am not sureStack: SP-2 = {501,A<1,?,'ATTACH'='','EMAILATTRIBUTES'='','MESSAGE'='throw a decent error!!','RECIPIENTS'='dj.morana.ctr@hanscom.af.mil','SUBJECT'='test sudesh step'>}

Toby_Bartlett_(hanafb04_-_(deleted))

Hi,As it turned out the change I made to LoadAgentConfig was correct!The problem was that the **** break point kept reappearing!once I successfully cleared the break point the module started working again!Does anyone have anything that's better than the Builder documentation provided?? Thanks for your help,David