IndexoutofBoundsException LLValue Index out of Bounds 11

Hi, I am working on a LAPI program in Java to scan and print a given Parent folder and all its subfolders , however after scanning the first subfolder of the Parent , the program stops and gives the message :-LLIndexOutOfBoundsException : LLValue index out of bounds : 11Can anybody please help from the attached program.Thanks in advance for any thoughts shared.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Howard_Pell

Message from Howard Pell <hlpell@opentext.com> via eLink

eLink

While your codelooks VERY familiar J you seemed to have changed the ‘for’loop to increment until i <=numItems+1 instead of as I have it in my code to

i<=numItems-1.

That is, youput a + instead of a – so your code loops beyond the number of items inthe recArray.

Howard
___
Howard Pell
Senior Technical Educator Liaison, Special Projects
Open Text Corporation
www.opentext.com
(519) 888-7111 Ext. 2203

From:eLink Discussion: LAPI Discussion [mailto:lapi@elinkkc.opentext.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 20072:50 PM
To: eLink Recipient
Subject: IndexoutofBoundsExceptionLLValue Index out of Bounds 11

IndexoutofBoundsException LLValue Index out of Bounds 11

Posted by biopkomawar (Komawar, Pranjali) on 10/23/2007 02:46 PM

Hi,
I am working on a LAPI program in Java to scan and print a given Parent folder and all its subfolders , however after scanning the first subfolder of the Parent , the program stops and gives the message :-

LLIndexOutOfBoundsException : LLValue index out of bounds : 11

Can anybody please help from the attached program.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts shared.

Pranjali_Komawar

Thanks for your help. Initially I had i<= numItems but I was getting Exception , then I changed it to i<=numItems+1Changing it to numItems-1 solved the problem , but logically I cannot understand as why do we even need +1 or -1 since I want the loop to run untill its equal to size() of the RecArray.

Howard_Pell

Message from Howard Pell <hlpell@opentext.com> via eLink

eLink

LAPI is zerobased.

Consider anexample of a recarray with 10 records. The “first” record isactually record 0 and the last record is record 9. When we get the size of therecarray we learn there are 10 records, so we count 0 to size-1 (10-1 = 9).

Does that help?

Howard
___
Howard Pell
Senior Technical Educator Liaison, Special Projects
Open Text Corporation
www.opentext.com
(519) 888-7111 Ext. 2203

From:eLink Discussion: LAPI Discussion [mailto:lapi@elinkkc.opentext.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 20073:42 PM
To: eLink Recipient
Subject: Thanks for your help.Initially I had

Thanks for your help. Initially I had		Posted by biopkomawar (Komawar, Pranjali) on 10/23/2007 03:38 PM
In reply to: RE IndexoutofBoundsException LLValue Index out of Bounds 11		Posted by hlpell (Pell, Howard) on 10/23/2007 03:21 PM

Thanks for your help. Initially I had
i<= numItems

but I was getting Exception , then I changed it to i<=numItems+1

Changing it to numItems-1 solved the problem , but logically I cannot understand as why do we even need +1 or -1 since I want the loop to run untill its equal to size() of the RecArray.