Hello,
I am looking for the download of the LAPI for Java. Somehow I am unable to find a link in the knowledge base.
So, is it possible to download the Java Packages or is it only distributed via the sdk disk?
Regards,
Timm
Hi Timm,
LAPI was last released as a part of the 9.7.1 SDK.
As per the download page for the SDK, the 9.7.1 SDK has been classified as restricted for export.
As such, you will need to contact your local OpenText Customer Support office to request the 9.7.1 SDK in order to obtain LAPI.
The official notice on this can be found by expanding the 9.7.1 section here:
https://knowledge.opentext.com/knowledge/cs.dll?func=ll&objId=4042029&objAction=browse&sort=name
Kyle
Thank You!
From where I can downl;oad Lapi SDK for CS10.03 ..... Actully I have to implement Security Clearence SDK
Kyle has posted right above this posting what the procedures to get LAPI 9.7/1 SDK. CS10 will accept lapi client calls but there is no 64 bit supplied by OT after 9.7.1 .9.7 code written in lapi should work against a CS10 instance.
Why use LAPI do you not have the support in webservices the lapi replacement?
A couple of weeks ago someone posted that Web services would not be replacing (all?) of LAPI and that there would still be need for both. Is that true or did I misunderstand?
From: eLink Entry: LAPI Forum [mailto:lapi@elinkkc.opentext.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 2:30 PMTo: eLink RecipientSubject: RE Download Java API
RE Download Java API
Posted by anair@alitek.com (Nair, Appu) On 05-09-2012 14:22
[To post a comment, use the normal reply function]
Topic:
Download Java API
Forum:
LAPI Forum
Content Server:
Knowledge Center
Jim I will try to give a layman explanation as I don't think you program.If I am mistaken please excuse.Also the first thing that people complain about lapi is that they cannot understand its data handling so I was basically advising the user to try the modern stuff.
Everything that you program(almost) in livelink is actually understood by the livelink system as Oscript.LAPI or the API for livelink consists of 2 separate parts.
Part 2 of the implementation is still part of CS10.OT is deprecating use of LAPI in favor of webservices which one of the obvious advantages is they do not have to support 4 or 5 languages.So Part1 that is the SDK for all those languages stopped after 9.7.1 SDK.Also OT will not invest their resources to fix any bugs in lapi.It goes without saying that newer things happening in livelink may not have a lapi equivalent.(again completely debatable as anybody can write this)
So for existing lapi investments,they will have to write using the 9.7.1 version and hope it works(it should) in CS10.This may continue till such time as OT thinks whether or not they can do away with Part2.
The new webervices also are of the same paradigm.Part1 the transport and client code layer and Part2 Oscript,whether you call it webservices,enterprise library services(SAP integrations use this kind to get stuff into livelink) or whatever anything useful in livelink is still performed by OSCRIPT.
The 64 bit vs 32 bit debut is still acheivable meaning a 32bit lapi app can run in a 64 bit system.In fact some OT products I have had to recompile for 64 bit systems.
For any lapi investments out there it is probably very safe.
Does that answer or give you confidence about lapi
Thanks for the explanation Appu.
From: eLink Entry: LAPI Forum [mailto:lapi@elinkkc.opentext.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:30 PMTo: eLink RecipientSubject: RE RE Download Java API
RE RE Download Java API
Posted by anair@alitek.com (Nair, Appu) On 05-09-2012 15:26
The new webervices also are of the same paradigm.Part1 the transport and client code layer and Part2 Oscript,whether you call it webservices,enterprise library services(SAP inte! grations use this kind to get stuff into livelink) or whatever anything useful in livelink is still performed by OSCRIPT.
This direction is all well and good, but functionality gaps remain with the web services that are accessible via LAPI. A few I know off the top of my head:
Until there is functionality parity, the web services can be used in some but not all circumstances.
If there are pieces of functionality not supported in the web services SDK but still needed, I recommend creating both sides, as it were.
. . . Darrin Tisdale